NDCCRT Post-Test and Evaluation Contact DisclosureIn accordance with the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) and the UND School of Medicine and Health Sciences CME Policy. None of the Providing Unit, Planners or Presenters for this educational activity have relevant financial relationship (s) to disclosure with ineligible companies whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients. Trade Name (s): NA Off-Label use: NAWhich sessions did you attend? State of the State: Colorectal Cancer in ND, Jared Marquardt, MD Rachel’s Story, Patricia Monson Implementing the Follow-up CRC Screening Measure, Elizabeth Ciemins, PhD, MPH, MA Introduction to the Colonoscopy Capacity Map, Jonathan Gardner Rural Colorectal Cancer Care in North Dakota, Shawnda Schroeder, PhD Panel: Implementing Follow-up CRC Screening Measure in Practice Implementation of Follow-up CRC Screening Measure Activity, Elizabeth Ciemins, PhD, MPH, MAState of the State: Colorectal Cancer in ND, Jared Marquardt, MDObjective: Describe the current screening, incidence and mortality data for North Dakota.The number of new colon and rectum cancer diagnosed in ND in 2025 is estimated to be: 110 275 360 504Did the speaker meet the objective for this session? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorDid this presentation meet your expectations? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorThis presentation is applicable to my practice/research. Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorRachel’s Story, Patricia MonsonObjective: Describe the emotional and systemic challenges faced by families affected by young-onset CRC.One in ________ new CRC cases are diagnosed before the age of 50. 10 50 100 1000Did the speaker meet the objective for this session? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorDid this presentation meet your expectations? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorThis presentation is applicable to my practice/research. Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorImplementing the Follow-up CRC Screening Measure, Elizabeth Ciemins, PhD, MPH, MAObjectives: Identify at least three interventions that improve colorectal cancer screening and follow-up rates and describe how these strategies can be adapted for implementation within their own healthcare settings.Rates of CRC colonoscopy follow up after a positive/abnormal SBT are __________ than rates for CRC screening? Similar Higher LowerFollow-up colonoscopy after a positive SBT should be completed: Within one year Within 90 days Within 6 months As soon as possibleDid the speaker meet the objective for this session? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorDid the speaker meet the objective for this session? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorThis presentation is applicable to my practice/research. Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorIntroduction to the Colonoscopy Capacity Map, Jonathan GardnerObjectives: Demonstrate the functionality and user interface of the Colonoscopy Capacity Map and how to locate facilities and view estimated wait times. Recognize the tool’s value in supporting timely colorectal cancer screening be improving access and decision-making for patients and providers. What is the primary purpose of the Colonoscopy Capacity Map? Compare Insurance Plans Schedule colonoscopy appointments directly Provide for electronic colonoscopy referrals to nearby colonoscopy facilities Locate colonoscopy facilities and estimate wait timesWhich of the following describes how the Colonoscopy Capacity Map supports colorectal cancer screening efforts? The tool reduces barriers to timely screening by improving access to timely screening or diagnostic colonoscopies The tool replaces the need for referrals The tool ensures that patients have access to financial assistance The tool ensures patients receive next day screening optionsDid the speaker meet the objective for this session? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorDid this presentation meet your expectations? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorThis presentation is applicable to my practice/research. Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorRural Colorectal Cancer Care in North Dakota, Shawnda Schroeder, PhDObjectives: Describe specific barriers to colorectal cancer screening in rural North Dakota as well as generate ideas to improve local screening rates.Community members in rural and urban areas discussed different barriers to colorectal cancer screening in North Dakota True FalseCommunity members stressed that provider communication was the most important thing they considered before deciding to complete their colorectal cancer screening. True FalseDid the speaker meet the objective for this session? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorDid this presentation meet your expectations? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorThis presentation is applicable to my practice/research. Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorPanel: Implementing Follow-up CRC Screening Measure in PracticeTiffani Moorman, RN, BCBS of ND Jennifer Weiss, Sanford Enterprise Stacy Wiest, RN, South Central Health Objective: Compare system-level strategies to improve follow-up colonoscopy rates after positive non-invasive colorectal cancer screening, with a focus on overcoming logistical, communication, and data collection related barriers.Which of the following is a common barrier to follow-up colonoscopy after a positive non-invasive test? Lack of patient interest in screening Limited availability of colonoscopy appointments Overuse of colonoscopy in low-risk populations High rates of false positives in non-invasive testsWhich of the following is most likely to improve follow-up colonoscopy rates after a positive non-invasive test for colorectal cancer screening? Sending annual reminders for stool-based testing Repeating the non-invasive test within six months Providing patient navigation services to coordinate follow-up care Referring patients directly to oncology after a positive resultDid the speaker meet the objective for this session? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorDid this presentation meet your expectations? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorThis presentation is applicable to my practice/research. Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorImplementation of Follow-up CRC Screening Measure Activity, Elizabeth Ciemins, PhD, MPH, MAObjective: Create a simple action plan for incorporating follow-up CRC Screening into their practice’s workflow, including at least two specific steps to improve patient follow-up rates.What is the reason for low rates of colonoscopy follow up after a positive/abnormal SBT? Inadequate communication between primary care and gastroenterology departments Lack of awareness of low follow-up rates Patient hesitancy to get a colonoscopy Lack of a quality performance measure for follow-upDid the speaker meet the objective for this session? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorDid this presentation meet your expectations? Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorThis presentation is applicable to my practice/research. Excellent Very Good Good Fair PoorOverall EvaluationEvaluationPoorFairGoodVery GoodExcellentDid the content fulfill the meeting objectives?What is your level of satisfaction with this event? How useful did you find this event? Programming/Content? Location? Length of meeting? Layout of the venue?Date of the event? Refreshments/Beverages?Value for money?CommentsWhy did you decide to attend this event?Did this event improve or weaken your impression of the NDCCRT? Please explain.Additional QuestionsYesNoWas the presentation free of commercial bias?Would you recommend this event to others?Will you attend future events put on by the NDCC?I am interested in getting involved in Policy Development and Advocacy.I have a cancer project that I would like to share during next year’s NDCC Annual Meeting.If you answered Yes to one or more of these questions, please explain:Please describe any changes you plan to make in your practice as a result of today’s presentations:If no changes are planned, what barriers may exist to prevent you from making changes? (Select all that apply) Clinical Application Resource Availability (staff, funding) Management priorities Fundamental delivery system redesign necessary Time constraint Need for training Reimbursement money Resistance to change OtherIf “Other”, please describe:Please describe any clinical situations that you find difficult to manage or resolve that you would like to see addressed in future educational activities:Knowledge, Competence, PerformanceYesNoNo ChangeThis activity increased by knowledge (knowing what to do)This activity increased my competence (knowing how to do something)This activity will improve my performance (one’s actual behavior in practice)If you answered “Yes” on any of these, please describe:Please indicate which of the following professional competency(s) was addressed by this educational activity: (select all that apply) Patient-centered care Medical knowledge Work in interdisciplinary teams Practice-based learning & improvement Employing evidence-based practice Interpersonal & communication skills Apply quality improvement Professionalism Utilize informatics/information technology Systems-based practiceProfessional Designation(s) MD, DO PA, NP PT PhD RN LPN OT PharmD, RPH RT, RRT Student Med Tech LCSW/LMSW OtherIf “Other”, please describe:CreditI certify that I attended the above program and claim hour(s) of credit. (Approved for up to 3.25 hours.)Enter # of credit hour(s) attended. Enter “0” if not claiming credit: First NameLast NameEmailCredential(s)Facility AddressAddress Line 1Address Line 2CityStateZip CodeSubmit Form
